Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 12 results ...

AbouRizk, S M and Halpin, D W (1992) Statistical Properties of Construction Duration Data. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 118(03), 525–44.

De La Garza, J M and Mitropoulos, P (1992) Flavors and Mixins of Expert Systems Technology Transfer Model for AEC Industry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 118(03), 435–53.

Eldin, N N and Senouci, A B (1992) Use of Scrap Tires in Road Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 118(03), 561–76.

Harris, R B (1992) A Challenge for Research. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 118(03), 422–34.

Hicks, J C (1992) Heavy Construction Estimates, with and without Computers. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 118(03), 545–60.

Nam, C H and Tatum, C B (1992) Government‐Industry Cooperation: Fast‐Track Concrete Innovation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 118(03), 454–71.

Nam, C H and Tatum, C B (1992) Strategies for Technology Push: Lessons from Construction Innovations. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 118(03), 507–24.

Russell, J S and Jaselskis, E J (1992) Quantitative Study of Contractor Evaluation Programs and Their Impact. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 118(03), 612–24.

Shaked, O and Warszawski, A (1992) CONSCHED: Expert System for Scheduling of Modular Construction Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 118(03), 488–506.

Skibniewski, M J and Chao, L (1992) Evaluation of Advanced Construction Technology with AHP Method. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 118(03), 577–93.

Thomas, H R, Smith, G R and Ponderlick, R M (1992) Resolving Contract Disputes Based on Misrepresentations. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 118(03), 472–87.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: Subsurface investigations; Construction; Contract management; Contracts; Dispute resolution; Conflict; Laws; Court decisions; Site investigation;
  • ISBN/ISSN: 0733-9364
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1992)118:3(472)
  • Abstract:
    This paper describes in a clear and understandable way the primary rules of law that are applied to construction contract disputes involving the misrepresentation of concealed or subsurface conditions. The rules are based on the judicial inquiries derived from more than 45 appellate court decisions. The rules are presented in the form of questions to be asked by contractors and contract administrators. The application of these questions should result in a correct determination of the dispute. The questions are organized in an easy‐to‐understand flow chart. The roles of the soil report and site visit and disclaimers clauses are also explained. The rules were tested using another 10 case decisions. The results show considerable consistency in the law and that the outcome is entirely dependent on the facts.

Tommelein, I D, Levitt, R E and Hayes‐Roth, B (1992) Site‐Layout Modeling: How Can Artificial Intelligence Help?. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 118(03), 594–611.